Removing tanks would remove one of the attacker's only ways of actually dealing damage to the wall (well played defenders)

Also, I have not seen a situation where a player has been completely boxed in at all sides, preventing escape

Kingstanchez I have saw this 3 times at 3 seperate sieges that I can remember. I have also not saw you at any siege I can remember.

Im always there, watching

Anyhow, I pull streams for sieges from my sources

I literally got banned for this today, even though it happened 2 weeks ago! I totally agree.

Your sources have clearly not been at any siege Rome has been involved in. I cant remember the last siege we have been involved in where this hasn't been a problem since this rule was added.

So, putting one's experiences to the side

How would attackers now have a reliable method of dealing damage to the wall
(towerd artillery has no versatile movement to avoid cannon fire)

Well, that's a good question, maybe if we removed the taxiing rule they would have a good way of attacking a city yeah?

And completely removing the rule outright would just leave to pilots just dragging those on the banner into the gank

@Kingstanchez you clearly dont understand the point of this ticket. Tanks are literally cancerous to use because stickmen attach to them and complain about you moving and you have a 2/3 chance of getting banned,which is quite annoying and makes tank using so stressful that you'd rather not use one

Which every town has, which is unavoidable and inescapable

And in my opinion taxiing should be a thing as tanks are meant to mow down people if not shoot them,not to mention you need 15 shells to kill a player with direct hits ans the machine gun drum thing isn't the most reliable thing

Oh yea, i completely get the issue
getting banned due to a player JUMPING infront of the tank is very dumb

But resorting to extreme measures like "either we have everything, or nothing" does not seem to logical

The problem is that rule makes tanks completely unusable except for small windows of time when there aren't 34323432 pvpers on the field. So it should be removed or maybe stinky smellies can bring out their own tanks to counter a dragging tank. Hell they still have antitank rifles what else do you need to counter tanks?

Its the only solution,either remove the rule or remove tanks,there is no middle ground even if staff say they ignore tickets that are obviously people jumping on tanks.

Stanchez that's the problem, smellies will continue to hop in front of tanks and whine taxiing no matter what as long as that rule exist, and eventually the bitching gets so loud staff will just ban the tanker. Remove the rule or remove tanks, simple as.

Exactly berry, Stanchez doesn't understand how sieges work apparently.

AT rifles are not normally common in your standard PVP loadout

If people weren't braindead they would be. There are many counters for tanks we don't need a rule for "hurr durr have fun moving your tank without getting banned lmao".

The suggestion title is framed wrongly, I would upvote "Remove the taxi rule" but not "Remove tanks"

Well Imperial, the problem is there are about 30 smellies that will downvote "Remove the taxi rule" into oblivion and it'll never get passed. I made the suggestion like it is because I want to show how ridiculous it has become to use a feature that was supposed to make inland forts somewhat siegeable.

They actually get so common during tank battles,AT rifles that is,that said people womt complain and attach to the tank and shoot from the back because it benefits them on the situation(they get dragged into the tank and shoot it open) but if they get dragged during tiny sword usage they get pissmad about it and make 20 tickets and 13 videos for 'proof' on youtube

What berry said, cosmic has had his tanks blown into multiple times with AT Rifles, I honestly have no idea where Stanchez got the idea that those aren't used from.

Well I remember at the socoa siege, Humik charged into the banner with a shitty box tank and dragged everyone into a gank. It was kind of bullshit. So I see where the rule is coming from. It would be better if the rule was more like, "You can't drag people out of their own claims using movecraft to kill them". Because that would definitely be a bullshit way to kill someone.

With proper armour they cant get through but the terracota percentages make ugly tanks as usual

Imperial why didn't socoa use one of their 245432343 guns on their walls to kill humiks tanks? Sounds like a skill issue... I agree with the second part tho if you do get dragged like that I'd still say it's a skill issue but ig it's fine for most of the server.

Agreed berry, along with its like one shot to kill most tank armor.

This entire chat ratioed

this guy has a point ngl. People find every reason to get their enemy banned even running into tanks on purpose to get the driver banned. I had seen this many times of people obviously trying to get someone banned on by using loopholes to trick them to getting banned.

remove ccnet plugin BOOM ,,CCnet SMP”

Well i also was 1v1ing melkron with tanks and after a while i was taking a bit of space between us and it moved him with me away from his tank and then he says " i am reporting you for that , i am recording" like wtf?