The Canadian Times: NAU to NoAU

Just the other day, the Texan nation, LSR, and the Canadian Dominion had discussed and implemented an incredible merger to form the mega-nation that was the North American Union but, political conflict broke out between the pro-oligarchs and the pro-democrats. Knowing the failed history of democracies over the course of ccnet’s history, long-time players from all over the world joined the congressional hearing (or the “congressional congress” as it was called) to debate the structure of the NAU government. The council were discussing plans to create a system that would merge the concepts of elected positions that anyone can work for with a strong council above but everything changed when it was made known that the pro-democrats would not compromise. With this, the dream of a united Americas swiftly collapsed, forcing the nation to be two separate ones once again. Regardless, the two nations will remain allies once they are split again… or so, that is what Canada hoped.

You see, not too long after the decision to become separate was made, some of the supposed pro-democrats abandoned their towns, packed all their technology and belongings, and fled to join other nations over seas. It’s clear by this maneuver that they cared only for their ambitions to be leaders of the North American Union rather than truly caring for “the voice of the people” as they claimed. If you’re one of those people and are reading this now, let me ask you this: what kind of leader would abandon their citizens in their time of need?

Thank you all for reading, this has been Lord Tre_2020 of Canada and have a good morning, good afternoon, and good night!

The first half is entirely correct and I will not debate you in that regard. The ladder however ignores a key factor in my severance and I believe in the severance of other leaders. You completely failed to mention the loss of the Fentagon, the Texan Movecraft base. This demobilized and demoralized leadership so heavily it caused the major divide. The other problem was that the fall of the Fentagon was entirely preventable and we had the cash to keep it a float, the reasoning of why cash wasn't put in lies solely on the man who mayors the town now. Granted there are other reasons, but these reasons are 'blame' based such as the much to hasty and impromptu admission into the NAU which left the nation occupied, the lack of a suitable Texan fort, and keep in mind Texas itself was going through internal divisions about government prior to joining the NAU. In fact we were just bewildered by the fact that Stvoviet had lost his popularity election as we were setting up a way to go about elections literally the day prior to unity with Canada.

We also did not abandon the citizens of Texas, many have accompanied us to the places we have left to. I personally have INVITED people to join me in South America. Abandonment is a strong and misused word, severance? Yes. Disconnection? Temporary disillusionment? Yes! But Abandonment? No, a hard no as well.

Tre I respect you as a leader and a champion of your people, but what you have written is simply a fallacy.

Thank you for the update Microwaved1 and I apologize if it seems that I am calling you out. To clarify, I am not calling out all who left. Those whom I’m referring to know who they are