basically you want tpa requests to only be made by those who can impact sieges (those with the appropriate rank)?

sounds fair enough

No, what it said is that if you give someone a soldier rank in your nation you take full responsibility about that person being able to potentially tp every enemy inside your base

While it sounds somewhat fair enough, I feel like that sieges should be about actual warfare rather than insiding every time and people being paranoid. One of the main reasons why we have anti griefing rule, so that mayors can invite people without being paranoid. Imagine having a new recruit or something and having to be paranoid if they single handedly ruin the whole siege experience

Lord, that is exactly what I read and what i was replying to.

those WITHOUT the appropriate rank shouldn't be able to (mechanically) TP hostiles into the bunker. (what I said)

Insiding and spying is all part of the geopolitical experience, if you remove the risk people simply stop caring and siege quality degrades as more "untrustworthy" players get drafted because the generals KNOW the rules will protect them encase their poorly thought out recruitment plan goes wrong

A person should not single handedly win a siege just by typing /tpaccept
The main reason in the past to why staff team changed lots of things in the past is that, I quote "the game called Nations, it should be about armies. One person should not be able to destroy an entire army single handedly. Its a team game". Whats the point of 20 people trying their best if one person can ruin their siege and fun. Information spying is a whole another thing.

> "poorly thought out recruitment plan"

I can say the same thing for the servers recruitment plan of including new players to sieges. Its not even worth it to be nice and help people learn the game compared to going on a pvp server and calling those people. Its been like that for years

insiding not in a siege zone to check supplies ect will still be legal this only applies in siegezone to prevent bunker breaches with tp by people who dont even have soldier in the attacker/defender side

bro/1?!?!

you know forts are ally perms???

i can just log my irl friend on to jon the opps then build a rep in 2 weeks and tp into bunker??

what part of that seems fair?

Yeah, basically I think people should fight it out on an actual siege rather than tping inside bases. Seems like a scuffed mechanic gameplay wise

in my opinion base tping should be like a trump card of sorts.
ie. in a neck and neck siege someone in the nation would be like "kaboom i'm a traitor" and tp people in.
imo it shouldn't be a regular occurrence. if you want to get into bunker otherwise just drill or look for unlocked fence gates and camp.