the server is a bit inactive and mostly because of school and yeah i agree truces.

The 'countless truces' (I'll assume you mean the first weekend of the month of) were implemented after the vast majority of the playerbase voted for it. There's also a truce this Christmas like every year, so that players are able to spend time with their family without stressing about their Minecraft nation. Not everyone is free 24/7 for a siege.

This post is not only untrue, it is stupid.
Firstly, the Christmas truce allows people to spend time with family and go on holiday without fear that their nation will collapse. The purpose for it is in essence a way to get away from sieges, which are very time-consuming.

Secondly, it is not the UK that just suffers... it is Rome, the Sahara confederation and the multitude of smaller nations that either were funded in part or wholly by duped gold. So the truce being pulled early is in effort to sustain these nations and give them time to re-evaluate and re-organise. To say this truce is just for the UK is to distort the facts.

Thirdly, Alliance vs Coalition will remain pretty much forever. After defeating GNE and the Saharan truce, Melkron insisted the server would break into separate factions. It did so for a month, before returning to the status quo.
So no, even if the Coalition won... it's likely the server would just die or the alliance would just take longer to regroup. The coalition had a golden opportunity to declare victory and disband but it chose not to. To speculate the future therefore, as previously done by Melkron, is a mistake in itself.

There are many things to do on CCnet, build new nations... get towns ready for the new deadline, naval regions, PVP regions. Enough to satisfy people. The future of CCNet should not be one with an oversaturation of sieges. In addition, these truces aren't inherently bad, they add a much-needed anticipation for a siege and are a build-up to something. It's a period where the dynamics of the server can change and a litmus test for siege preparation.

Quite frankly, get a life.
CCnet is not dying over the fact you cant sit in a banner fort for 2 days.

I'm not sure if you're aware, but a major nation was disbanded and their members have had a lot of resources taken from them as a result of the duping fisasco right before major finals and holidays for a majority of our playerbase who are still in school.

The truce is starting slightly early, because it would be absolutely unreasonable to allow you to trounce the players affected by the actions of the exploiters -- It is not their fault that their leadership has caused them significant displacement and distress by breaking server rules, and it's absolutely reasonable for us to give them an extra couple of weeks to reorganize after their losses, as noted in the announcement.

Quite frankly, you haven't made a suggestion here but a rant and I don't really care what your opinion on this matter is. This is not a decision we are allowing the playerbase to influence. If you'd like to actually make a suggestion, feel free to suggest more things we could give you to do on Nations beyond hammering forts with explosives.

I also wonder who you would siege should you knock every other nation off the map. Are you implying that a player-caused truce would not also lead to this so-called "inactivity" you're claiming has occurred? Results are arguably the same -- no one to siege.

40 player peaks are by no means small numbers, they're merely less than you are used to seeing concurrently and I'm not concerned for the servers playercount at the moment, numbers are expected to drop after leadership of a major nation is banned and final exams are approaching. Morale is low and siege prep isn't as vital right now, there is no reason to expect this trend to continue permanently.

I dont know if you know but there hasnt been a large siege in months anyways, regardless of uk getting wiped off the map. This is literally just how i personally feel and i dont see no reason for you to become so pissy about it.

what is your obsession with UK getting wiped off the map, the truce has nothing to do with us why are you blaming us??? Also.. get a life??? You aren't even an active person in sieges all I see you do is cap banner then log off so why are you so desperate for sieges.

Is their nobody you can talk to? No towns to build no nation to develop??? Is your entire existence based on wether their is a siege or not?


I can tell the heavy hope that you want UK to be sieged and it's obvious you would be on the attackers side however ending the truce will do what? Make the opps siege Rome or Britain??? Do you WANT your allies to get sieged?? Wake up.


Also 40 players at the same time is ALOT... Imagine 40 people in the same room

Please seek a life and read whatever illyt said cuz it looks constructive

Linnanjohtaja, this is a suggestion page.
Not a place you can come to rant about which nation you would like to flatten.

(because completely steamrolling a nation is "fun and enjoyable" and will totally boost player numbers)

that's pretty much stupid most players have uni or school work to do as my friends most of them need to do uni work that we barely hear each other pointless suggestion

Rick please tell me which part of my suggestion doesnt seem like a suggestion to you. All im literally saying is that staff shouldnt remove sieges just to save a side from losing.

Aliitsme do you realize how ironic it is that youre telling me who hasnt played the server in weeks to get a life. And also why would you make a comment that literalmy has nothing to do with my suggestion and is literally just personal attacks directed at me

Also the truce was extended to save britain thats literally what ineusia said

This guy is so anti-British that he must be British IRL.

Linnan, the sieges stopped happening as much because people started to focus on the new siege regions (and pvp assault regions). The last major siege I remember attending was Trapezitsa a couple months back. Ever since the focus shifted to siege regions I've noticed more and more pings on the coalition discord to attend siege regions and have only ever seen small sieges promoted as a "go if you want to" ordeal. It's not the server that's causing the issue here, it's the players. If you want to see more sieges then talk to the rest of alliance and plan one!

As countless people have stated before, people have lives around this time of year. That's the way it's always been on nations. Give it a bit and people (students) will start to play more during the spring break/vacation. I do agree that nations feels kinda dead right now, but it's simply due a lack of focus on sieges on either side and a slew of IRL commitments.

This month is designated for rebuilding and building anew if you do choose to play, so take that opportunity and start building instead of complaining on the suggestions forum.

omg i'm sorry that came off as really rude :(

i'm ur biggest fan linnan dwdw <3

I actually started complaining on the suggestions forum as a result of starting to play the server again lol

xd 😭

I did not expect people that hate the Christmas Truce to exist, the name of the truce says it all, its end of the year month last year 2022-2023 it lasted over a month it was even longer than 2021-2022

Zanity sieging naval region on Christmas moment

Im arguing against extending the truce because of the sahara collapse, not the truce taking place taking place during christmas and new yars ever, of course no one is going to be playing during the christmas eve