1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. A bit to ambitious for N2.
4. I like this idea.
5. Maybe... but they ought to be very weak.
6. Elaborate please.
7. I don't think submarines need terracotta. Realistically, a single shell hitting the hull would cause the entire thing to implode if under water. Submarines don't need armour.
8. Yes.
9. Elaborate please.
10. I like this, but it may come with some exploitation. Should only work for fixed cannons so that turrets can't have rotating guns that are directly on the deck.

a funny thing is that i think zaify or someone has kept an eye on my criminal record as suprisingly when i started using bombers for popping zeppelins they added AA for them and in my 3rd encounter a zeppelin could survive about 10 missiles even if it is only 1k large. this could get weaponized by being used by other crafts which wool isnt really meant to have. i kinda agree on the submarine but it doesnt implode and it is usually made with high quality steel to fight against the pressure. it wouldnt get penetrated easily irl. global events could be fun like the cultist hide and seek and the kiev event which brought the community a lot together. i think ccnet needs this right now as it is very seperated as of right now. i understand your worries as exploitation but it shouldnt bring much. i was talking about tank cannons mostly rather than turrets. turrets are fine as of right now i think. about the small bomb idea is that fighters could take out stuff faster than 2 minutes of circleling around and slowly ripping a vehicle. the air category is really overpowered if used right as of right now which also really makes this suggestion worse.

Okay. I don't much agree with the wool thing as 10 missiles is an exaggeration. You can easily kill a 7k zeppelin with a single missile.

10 is a terrible idea. It got added on purpose because in a certain placement of terra blocks and cannons the thing became invicible for some reason and also people would make goofy tanks where the cannon barrel is as hidden as possible

1. Yes i guess
2. Yes, seems reasonable
3. Would be cool but i dont think that would be possible
4. Very nice idea
5. As long as they are balanced/not that powerful, i approve
6. idk abt this one.
7. As a submariner i think this is awesome however i dont think a sub really needs Terracotta, and with 0.7% on a max. 2000 block craft. Those are like 14 blocks max. so basicly useless. Still, as a submariner i like it
8. Yes
9. Idk what you mean with that.
10. Bad idea (S3xyBerry already explained why)

Ashes this is based on experience and i can show a clip of me trying to shoot a balloon. I have intercepted about 3 zeppelins if i do remember with a bomber w/missiles. After my first or second encounter in nations zaify added anti air to zeppelins and in my 3rd zeppelin popping attemp it survived about 10 missiles and because my pc doesnt even have a hampster but an ant running it i cannot download any medal type of recorder to see from my perspective. I only have the ground perspective recorded my mcburgerwarrier (credits)

Also yes i am aware of why it was created in the 10th suggestion but i only mentioned under the cannon. I think the side is reasonable but there shouldnt be any advantage putting armor under the cannon. I dont think it will make it "invicible" and not make goofy tanks.

opening your chests in claims where you don't have perms can be easily abused, and it's also your vechile, your responsibility to not get into claims when u need the chests that are on your craft

could you tell me how it could be abused?