I like this idea. It should carry either one Autocannon or two Missile Launchers, but it should have a much higher sinking threshold than normal aircraft, because the whole reason planes have to be cruising to fire their guns is so that we don't basically have a floating turret with machine guns.

Higher sinking threshold as in it sinks at like 90%-85% health.

What speed would be thought for this?

uh maybe a little faster than zep but slower than plane

I see, I just wouldn't want bombers and fighters to become obsolete.

What kind of materials would it be?

Wool or terra or fighter materials?

It sound like a high offense week defense kind of movecraft.


Much love <3

ye i would prob give very low or none armour but for it to have heavy armerment
such as like 4 fighter guns or to missiles I would also like the lock on feature on nations that's soo cool

Also the likes to dislikes are crazy

Also prob concret+wool and some Redstone lamps

i support ashes idea. it would be nice for an autocannon to have it and a few rockets/missiles but because it can hover it has quite a lot of advantages and disadvantages. maby people will use it wrong and exploit its vtol version into a fighter type of aircraft. i think missiles which dont do much damage could be good. and also helicopters are known to be like tanks IRL which can survive hits. it should have maby a very very small amount of protective layer which could be terracotta or something else new. sinking point could be the same as a fighter tho. it would be interesting use as anti IFV and Tank but i can be sure that missiles wouldnt do anything against heavytanks. i suggest maby 1 fighter machine gun and 4 missile launchers. the missile launchers are like rockets because well a missile is not a missile if its unguided. its classified as a rocket. but they dont do enormous damage so thats why i think 4 is enough. the speed would be hover mode, 4 blocks per second and fastest could be maby about 7 blocks per second. it will be weak to AA and even cannons with fast reload but this is not up to my hands but up to the devs hands and the owners decition if this is balanced.

hmm well prob keep light armour. maybe little to none
also DAMN like no one hates dis pls admins I beg you also when I first sugestied this I was thinking more transport heli but a attack helicopter seems more required also I would make a custom cannon/gun for it called helicopter cannon or what ever but I can penetre heavy tank/tank terracotta so a block built Tankgewehr M1918 but its in the admins hands

I'm quite sure the tankgewehr is meant for ifvs not heavy tanks

No like a tankgeger block built FOR tanks and heavy tanks only for helicopters DUH

<3

Love you

the T-gewehr only affects IFV's :I

IK IT AFFECTS IFVS A TOTALLY DIFFERNET CANNON BLOCK BUILT OR NOT WOULD BREAK ARMOUR ON A HEAVY TANK /TANK

LOVE YOU <3
-XRUW

GOD DAMN 10-0 WTF EVERYONE WANTS A HELI LESSSSS GOOOO

idk. honestly the point is. will it only be used in server movecraft or gunna be used on some sweaty aviation enjoyers for general transport (me)

If it's without aircraft carrier I will use it daily

If it's with an aircraft carrier needed then it will only be used on movecraft server, it should 100% be unarmed if that's the cost of not requiring an ACC or zeppelin near it

true
think it should not require a zeplian and for it to be used in sieges

meowsalod there is a reason why you need motherships to carry planes. imagine ur a newbie and u just see a fighter going mach 2.2 and bombing the ground under you

bruh

its fine

Oliver my point is that if we can have it without the ACC in exchange for it being completely unarmed then it would be worth it, else people would just use the existing planes

Meowsalod honestly if i get a penny every time someone suggests that and doesnt get answered. I would get 20 bucks.