BDM Doors in Sieges • CCNet

BDM Doors in Sieges Back

Nxva 2 months ago

Okay, here comes a controversial one. Im making the suggestion myself because i know many people are thinking about this.

BDM Doors is being used in unfair ways in sieges by digging massive holes with blocks above it and then activating it effectively “ganking” someone. Here’s my reasoning why it should be illegal.

1. The Unfair times when it is used. these are used in ways that are so unfair. Let’s say at the recent boschia siege. greymesa is coming to banner all the way from toronto when Zimotheus (lore accurate) activates a bdm trap under greys feet ganking him and then since grey isn’t very good at pvp and is a gunspammer. it sends him all the way back over 10k blocks back.

2. New player friendly, Imagine if your a new player and your heading to a boschia siege. you finally get there and are heading to the banner after hearing them tell you to come to banner when you instantly get sent into a hole with drip stone killing you. Is that going to make you want to play more sieges or ever do a siege again? probably not.

3. No way of detecting it easily. it is rly difficult to detect one of these without digging around or if it is obviously flat.

4. Is it really fun? How is putting someone in a hole everytime they leave their base actually fun. Fact is. it isn’t fun. some travel over 1 hour to come to the siege. just to die to a bs method in the siege. it isn’t fun.

That’s why i believe bdm’s should be illegal in siege zones. (Please share ur honest opinion and don’t just downvote)

Comments

greymesa 2 months ago

why did you have to use me as the example bro 😭😭

greymesa 2 months ago

why did you have to use me as the example bro 😭😭

greymesa 2 months ago

what the sigma it posted twice

stereoIm 2 months ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0524zSfAra8

shoutout to zimotheus, he posted a video of how he used it. I don't see how this is fair at all and in the video he was ganking 7ett, literally someone who quit in N1 and just came back recently. Poor guy probably was confused as hell, he couldn't pearl or break blocks, then died to a dripstone trap like that. How is that any fun to people like them?

Either this is made illegal (You can't use bdm traps in siege zones)
Or you shouldn't be able to make BDM doors in wild AND use BDM commands during combat. (both together)

I do not see how this is any fair at all to any players, this really makes the siege experience worse so please do something about this before every siege is just BDM traps everywhere. If you have any point (you don't) that this is fair, let me know in the comments.

has_z 2 months ago

damn he ganked some IWF members :sob:
zimo ngl prolly gonna yap how we always patch stupid "strategies" like that lmao

Fqrtex 2 months ago

because someone lives far away and isnt a "pvper" doesnt make it a valid argument to why bdm traps should get removed. Putting people in holes happens anyway and even if BDM traps get removed it will continue to happen. Ofcourse its not "fun" if you get ganked but if thats why they get removed then every other gank in wilderness and in forts should get removed aswell.

Dhiras 2 months ago

Yall are victimizing those guys so much, that 7ett guy didnt had a climbing pick and was lurking around that drip gank so much so what do you expect.

Traps have been historical been part of every war IRL, yes its not fun to get trapped but this is how warfare is done.

You have to careful of enemy traps and etc, not coming here and victimizing reckless players.

"stupid strategies" there's no such thing, if a strategy works in killing people then its good otherwise its not.

firestar9990 about 1 month ago

I see why one would ban it, and I agree that it's probably too new, but here's the "devil's advocate" position of mine:

It would be that its only use would be in defense, and it'd be near-impossible to use offensively. If BDM traps become more widespread, also, I am sure players will become more aware of it and learn skills to avoid it as well as being more prepared in case one falls into it. Instead of being a fun-leeching thing, it'd likely simply make the skill ceiling for PVP higher, and allow players to make more ingenious defenses for forts, and therefore actually increase the amount of fun players would have in the long run.

Konstantin_XI about 1 month ago

I would put just legal in defensive forts, thats fair, but in offensive wilderness is unfair.