There are plenty of tools already coded to help with these issues:

E.g.

1. Got a problem with large armies?. - Lower the siege balance cap.

2. Got a problem with enemies putting in overtime hours to cap?
- Enable the Capping Limiter
- If enabled already, decrease the num-allowed-caps-per-day.

3 . Read your discord. This just went to x3 . Still not enough?
- This would be a configuration issue, not a call for new code.
- For example, if the modifier was x100, any small nation, even a one man army, could turn a battle in a similar way to before, by waiting until the last 10 minutes, log in smash and grab, and then at a rate of 30 pts a minute, they would get 15,000 points, which is enough toilet paper to serious clog up the enemy sewer without the need for any completely new features.

The old system gave almost-one-man armies a chance to defeat an almost arbitrarily large opponent after sitting out most of the battle until the last 10 minutes. An 100x modifier would do the same thing.

Trouble is, this leads statistically to more boring battles, and unnaturally amplifies the importance of small groups of highly skilled pvp'ers (including clans), who can turn almost any battle, even against a well supplied and moderately skilled group of casual players.

The existing x3 modifier seems like a more sensible choice imo. If you still want more, then just increase the value but in any case there's no need to revert the code.

no no, this is actually a genius idea, limit so only 5 people can cap a session, this nerfs offline capping, while also making it fair and square for both sides, weak and strong nations, now instead of getting as many people for capping as possible, you will need to think tactically and hold the banner for rest of the session, and possibly reduce the amount of clan pvpers people bring, this will involve more tactics in defending the banner instead of just oh no they reversed lets just reverse again and get extra bonus with our 30 people while they got 10, zaify should definetly implement this, atleast temporarily to see how it goes

+ killing people, and breaking movecraft would add alot to the siege points, and actually make a difference instead of getting 2k points from sinking 5 tanks but they get 20k points because they'ev sacrificed 5 tanks to cap with 30 people

Numbers already have the advantage of being able to swarm the enemy,limit their banner point capacibility to make it more fair

The key problem with this suggestion is that it is extremely cavalier towards the time of your own server staff.

I wrote down 3 already-existing features which might solve your problem. But you did not engage in any meaningful way with that information, and instead barrelled ahead with your already-chosen solution.

If this is you think development should be done now,
how about one of you steps up take responsibility for the feature ?
1. First you add it in code (its not that hard),
2. Then you support it, including taking complaints from players if they think it has caused a problem.
3. I guarantee when it is your own time, and not somebody else's, that you are asking for, you will get a lot more careful with your requests. (which is a good thing)
4. I'm not even joking about this. As far as I know, CCNET are looking for dev's. Learn a bit of Java, give Zaify a ping and see what you can do. That would benefit you greatly by learning a new skill, and I've no doubt you could make some valuable improvements for the server.

The solution is 100% legit and flawless I dont know what you're saying. I dont have to code for it Im playing Minecraft not Termux. If 5 ppl can cap the banner then sessions would have a cap of how unbalanced they can be. Means if I can assemble 5 people and somehow push the 90 people swarm off the banner I can still recover points.

Siege reversal multipliers are as useful as toilet paper in a gun barrel