Why you should add 15% melee dmg buff • CCNet

Why you should add 15% melee dmg buff Back

ChickenKing06 over 2 years ago

-NonPvpers will have a greater chance of killing the PvPer when in numbers, giving them the advantage because the pvper isn't going to expect it.

-The 15% melee dmg buff isnt big. It only decreases the number of hits you need to kill someone by 1-2.

-"If the difference isn't that much, why should we add it in the first place?"- Well, this buff will account for all the hits that are lost to lag/tps or "unregistered hits", which will mean the damage output would be the same as on a server with normal tps/lag. "The server is 20 tps ", this doesn't account for the frequent lag spikes, as well as the increased ping for all players, Asian players typically get 200-300 ping in wars + NA players get 100-200, Which would mean its' extremely difficult for both non-pvpers and pvpers to land hits against laggers, and although hits wont go through the 15% will negate all the unregistered ones.

-Yes it increases the skill gap, but only by a small amount, and since the skill gap in ccnet is already very low due to the guns and kb1 pvp, and gank meta makes a very small difference.

-Non pvpers, shouldn't take part in discussions that don't concern them, and it would be more beneficial to the health of the server if they would listen to the pvper community instead who knows what works and what doesn't. Rarely do non pvpers go to wars other than to gun spam as cannon fodder so they have very little war experience and they shouldn't take part in a fundamental decision like this one, as they don't have enough knowledge of the subject to make an accurate and trustworthy judgement.

Comments

Mr_sad_Frog over 2 years ago

Your main argument is that some asian players lose hits to lag but all this will do is give an advantage to euro pvpers that don't lose hits to lag.
Just another bad lofigrill suggestion

NotWeirdGuy over 2 years ago

As someone who sucks at PVP, but frequently part-takes in it on ccnet. Not only have you insulted me and everybody else who doesn't sweat pvp, but also uploaded possibly the worst, least sensible, and most contradictory suggestion I've seen in ages. According to the last paragraph, my opinion doesn't matter to you, so I'll make this response brief.
1. In your first paragraph, you mention how this will give non pvpers the advantage against regular pvpers, yet in your fourth paragraph, you said it increases the skillgap? these two things are entirely contradictory, make up your mind. Moreover your reasoning for suggesting that non pvpers whould have a greater chance of taking down pvpers is flawed to begin with. You mention how they would have the advantage because "The pvper is not expecting it" My friend everybody can see new additions to the server, its announced in development. I have a pretty good reason to believe the pvper would be suspecting it. And despite numerous references to 'gun spammers' I believe defined as a person who primarily uses guns as their main style of pvp. Your reasoning only makes sense if vanilla pvp existed in a bubble on ccnet, adding a decent sized boos to melee weapons like this would significantly reduce the usefulness of guns in combat compared to swords.
In any case, most gunspammers are aware of what it is like to be charged by melee pvpers, thus they ARE equipped to weigh in on this decision because it also effects them. Thank you and goodbye.

Frambaby over 2 years ago

lofigrill suggestion = downvote

Frambaby over 2 years ago

i do wonder if this person even plays on ccnet

Perpltxed over 2 years ago

Simply no. This benefits only the players who grind high damage dia pot pvp and no one else.

Kingstanchez over 2 years ago

ah yes, the damage creep form of balancing
(it does not work)

S3xyBerry over 2 years ago

Can this player reveal himself