u know the more this gets downvoted the more it approves that it's too OP and people want to stay it that way

You are nothing more than a kid I see.
"If YoU dOwNvOtE yOu BaD" and that's just plain stupidity.

HumanError on his way to downvote every person thats not from his nation
8)

This suggestion sucks either way idc

I'm not a kid, and I hope you have read it correctly, it only affects towns that are in the seige zone off the center (which is the banner) because it already allows firespread on towns that are in the same nation near the defending non peaceful town,

it's just to balance out seige peaceful seige town uses

I've read the suggestion, but afaik fire spread is toggled in near towns neither the same Nation nor others nations so this will affect proper peaceful towns way more than siege towns. If this suggestion was about PVP toggled everywhere near the banner would've been a good suggestion, but allowing griefing is not.

@S3xyBerry I've downvoted more nordic suggestions than non-nordic ones

As Human stated, I can only see this being used as a convenient excuse to grief peaceful towns - imagine you siege Matsumoto and then proceed to burn down all of Tokyo!

I mean, I won't say no to arson Zaify :D but yeah bad suggestion