For the longest time, the "reason" that staff/alliance use to not add any regions in Asia, is because no one will siege them.

North/South America, has 3 siege regions close to them, yet less activity is seen there.
Africa with 5 siege regions surrounding it.
Europe with 3 siege regions right on its doorstep.
Asia - 1.5 (Pacific only gives half) within 6000 blocks of each other.

Yet arguably, Asia/Oceanic is more active then North/South America and sometimes Europe.

Asia has received a poor hand on regions from staff. Every player on the server gets a fair chance to siege any region at any time. Yet the excuse in Asia is no one sieges it. The Alliance chooses not to siege it. It is a poor excuse on the staffs part, and the alliance for reasons to remove/not add regions.

If we kept this mindset for every region, when was North Atlantic sieged last? Why wasn't it deleted like Pacific, since we have agreed as coalition that we will not siege it. If we just stopped movecraft sieges would they get deleted? No. Or this hasn't been the case since I started the server.

The way it looks to me, is where the Alliance is active, is where regions are added. Which is unjust to anyone in Oceanic/Asia.

Could staff please review how they spread the regions, and the region rewards fairly, and equally on every part of the map?