Forced Truce Balancing • CCNet

Forced Truce Balancing Back

GamingGoneDope 10 months ago

The new forced Truce thing is something that's okay but the bad thing about it is someone can wait till the last day before a revolt and put in the command of the forced truce , I suggest the forced truce happen as the following :
If it's a surrender , the force truce will need to be immediately signed and will last 15 Days max .
If it ends normally , The forced truce will take effect also immediately if approved by the attacker and would last whatever it is already .
This would remove the possibility of signing it right before and this could lead to an uneffective nation for up to 2 months if timed perfectly with peace weeks

Comments

galacticwarrior9 10 months ago

You can't force a truce with a nation that you are sieging or is sieging you.

PandaDeltaFrappe 10 months ago

I think he means that a truce can be forced right before the siege starts

galacticwarrior9 10 months ago

I don't understand the downside of that. Can you explain? I only see it as a benefit: the occupied nation achieves its goal of being unoccupied, since by forcing a truce the occupier will be forced to release your towns. This makes a revolt unnecessary.

GamingGoneDope 10 months ago

the truce will keep the nation from fighting in sieges for a month normally but if someone starts the truce right before the revolt window opens for example i got sieged on 14th June
The occupying nation would do the Forced truce command on 27th June , which means we cant counter siege until 9th of July if you account the peace weeks and 1 Month truce

Dhiras 10 months ago

I see the down side here is you can effectively make a nation not able to start sieges against each other for 1 month, 2 weeks or even 1 month, 3 weeks

galacticwarrior9 10 months ago

Is that necessarily a bad thing in every case? A lot of people complain about an endless siege/counter-siege cycle.

andrew___ 10 months ago

Its not just sieges but pvp regions and movecraft regions that you cant participate in the reason ppl complain about endless sieges is cause nations doesent really have a replayability of sorts everything is just unfun grinding for a siege cause theres not mutch else to do

GamingGoneDope 10 months ago

if we get forced to stay 1 month doing nothing what do you expect , we would want to counter siege someone as soon as we get unoccupied , not be occupied for 21 days then get a forced truce right as we revolt , yes we do get unoccupied but still 1 month without counter sieging , and if that nation sieges regions we cant help our allies too .