No. That is shit of a suggestion and i dont need to explain why

I like it I don’t why this would be bad

Good idea cossie

Oh wait can’t the ships just get covered in signs to prevent any damage then?

No because a sign is like a torch,it will be floating signs in the vacant space left by explosions so u still can hit the ship

Stop trying to make ships so basic, signs should break ofcourse, u cant have invincible periscope, and like never ever has my turret sign broke before all the cannons bad suggestion u should cope and understand that ur craft is breaking apart is point of fightd

(Had stroke while writing)

Bad idea: this is an unrealistic suggestion. In real life, if the mechanism that rotates a turret gets hit by a shell, it will likely stop working and you won't be able to rotate the turret. Although rotation mechanisms aren't signs in real life, this still shouldn't be a part of the game.

_Orqnge this is a game, not real life. I don't understand why this HAS to be realistic. But this would also promote the usage of ships with Turrets compared to those which are shotgun ships, simply because now you wouldn't have to worry about the turret breaking.

And if you're THAT worried about people abusing the crap out of this, then you should just add a # or % limit on signs, not hard.

If it is so realistic then make guns 1 shot u mf and once you die you cant respawn

It aint about realism, ur coping about bad designs so u try to make them more effective, personally i never had an issue with signs