As an example, for those who don't understand the "adding battle points to the war chest"

For reference the warchest in this "example siege" is $1,000

Say a tank dies, the tank adds +200 points to whichever side killed it. Those "200" regardless of who killed it will be added to the warchest, which for this example is 1000, so adding the 200 points or, $200 means the warchest is $1200!!

now if you were to imagine this going on for 48 hours, You can probably imagine a siege like this ending up with a Warchest around $8,000 or more.

Ok Firstly, if you actually win the siege you've probably gained sets in general. And as for heavy tanks, let's say you lose ten in a siege. A decent plundering more than compensates for that. And that's more tanks than are typically lost by one side. Now of course I'm speaking from my experience in Nordic. I can only recall one siege where we actually won and didn't come out with a net positive of sets. So your point about a few rewards is kind of not true. If you don't come out on top of sets we typically call that a phyric victory. And those typically aren't rewarding. And in my opinion. It's enough that losing a movecraft vehicle makes you lose points. We don't need to discourage the use of movecraft any further. And really? Duct tape? Most I've ever used during a siege was like ten stacks. That's really not much even if you buy every single material needed to make them.

*One point you might have though is about the potions. 100 dubs of potions is incredibly costly and it is in no way recompensated. This is unfortunately a fundamental flaw with pot pvp itself. And your proposed changes wouldn't even come close to offsetting the cost of all those potions anyhow.

If the outpost trades and admin shops come into play then lots money will come in to the play then in overall this issue of 100 dub of pots issue can be solved(my assumption)

This is lame I dont wanna lose 40,000$ from a siege because the whole server shows up its so excessive

Unless the war chest stays the same for defenders after they lose but u get extra I simply dont want this its too much money and considering the geopol in this server sometime there will be a bad moment where u have no defenders so u lose by 40,000$ that would be such a great loss even though one might say u can make it with silver and such, an addition like this would make every town that loses simply go to ruin should it be the first siege or the supressions after

I'm not saying the warchest $$$ throught the siege would be supplied by the town, it'd be supplied by the server.

basically generating money

you mean the additional will be generated right?

yes

Actually based this will encourage siege

This is just trying to turn sieges into a quick-cash grab. Sieges are meant good long term investments, despite people forcing said sieged towns to ruin in to avoid it. I would personally be in favour of increasing the cooldown for revolts to make the occupation last longer but not increase the short term expense of the besieged towns.

Sieges are meant to enforce influence and authority, not just pillaging and ravaging.

Sieges are a very inefficient long term investment lmao almost not worth it in major fights

I believe with the new addition, of having to make more unpeaceful towns because of the recent changes coming to CCNet. It would make sense to add some bigger incentive to go fight, or atleast make it so that what you're spending on fighting, you atleast HAVE a chance to get back.

Not to mention, a majority of the entertainment and excitement people find in CCNet is through sieges, problem is, sieges are such a big hassle that nobody wants to go through preparing a lot for, because considering EVERYTHING you HAVE to get, it's a legitimate like 2–3-week prep if you're preparing for a good siege.

Literally, we know that sieges are a majority of the fun on CCNet because we've been putting more effort into them than anything else, so why not make them more frequent? by giving the winning side some more $$$?

Sure, some nations have these "special people" who enjoy grinding, but the having to "start from scratch" to reproduce what you've lost in a siege every single time you siege is a gigantic pain for most players.

Because even if you do win a siege, and even if you occupy some nation, and vassalize, and tax, The rate of return is NOT enough to allow a nation to be able to regenerate what they need for another siege.

I'm down for this based suggestion then

player kills should also count solely that this is giving me military logistics vibes and human casualty is the same as losing a tank