Thanks for writing all this down. Pvp regions would be very cool thing to add. Perhaps for the actual mechanics behind winning a pvp siege region, it could be something like King of the Hill where players have to stay in a spot (cool build/landmark or something) after they start a siege in order to win it. The other players/teams would contest this spot and it could be a cool battleground optimized for pvp (like removing any tall grass, flowers, etc).

Yes pls yes pls yes pls yes pls yes pls

This would be really nice to have, and it might allow for proper town sieges to be focused solely on mixed-pvp, as opposed to leaning on any particular type of combat (which would be covered with these individualized siege regions).

This is a good idea, new source of pvp thats not ridiculously costly like town sieges or completely reliant on movecraft like naval/tank sieges.

Regions could be in central asia/siberia, places that arent occupied but would still be contested by large land powers. Maybe a one in sub saharan africa/the amazon/canada aswell.

I think it should be a capping system with like a building in the middle that has a red wool area of where u need to stand to cap. Said building would have 4 corners but also 4 entrances (and be relatively small)

Great suggestion (credit to golden). I can add one detail which adds glowing to player who starts siege. So it wont be hard to kill the guy, (maybe)

Partially true, there will always be mfs at naval regions ruining ur movecraft fun tho, this would only give them morr things to do
Nice idea

If u had time to learn your pvp "skills" then you will have time to learn movecraft, nations that cant pvp will have no chance to win these regions, stupid and bad suggestion

Sieges are exactly for pvp, do sieges if u cant pvp elsewhere

siege regions were made for movecraft and should stay with movecraft, pvp already poisons every aspect of the game so lets not take another feature away

Rattlyy speaking faxx

peti ur arguments work the other way too. players that have time to learn movecraft have time to learn pvp skills (i'm not saying players should learn pvp because pvp can be boring for a lot of players), but some players don't like pvp, or movecraft, or guns. this doesn't take away anything for movecraft players, it only gives more things to players that don't want to use movecraft, but swords and guns instead. just because the siege regions were made for movecraft doesn't mean movecraft is losing anything. all the naval siege regions should stay as they are, and these new siege regions wouldn't give any naval chokepoints or anything, just money like the sahara siege region. giving more things for players to do doesn't take away anything from anyone else, just gives more to the community

It's a bad idea, adding this would make sieges pointless, U guys are too scared to siege anyone else apart from AS with the whole world, go and siege nations, if U want to PvP. This suggestion is clearly bad, and would have a bad affect on ccnet.

sieges aren't just for one specific type of pvp, it's a mixture of all pvp. the last few sieges had almost no vanilla pvp and was mostly movecraft or guns. have u ever actually tried to siege a big town? it takes weeks of planning and grinding and it really is no fun for the players that have to do it. having small fights won't ruin anything on ccnet and won't stop big sieges because people don't siege towns just for the fighting, but for the political benefits too like occupation. naval siege regions exist with people using movecraft quite a lot in sieges (lately it's the most common form of fighting in sieges), and that never made sieges pointless, so why would u think this would make sieges useless. like i said people siege towns for the political benefits, not just for fighting

All the sieges I did was for fights, I have never seen an roleplay siege happen on ccnet, and yes I have been in lots of sieges, I am way experienced than most of the playerbase, I exactly know what to do for a siege. If U need weeks for preparation and planning, that means only one thing that U suck at planning, and U are poor. It's too easy to plan sieges and prepare for them on ccnet, and U are wrong that there wasn't vanilla PvP last sieges, there was lots of PvP going on, but if U don't like the server features such as guns, and movecraft, U are free to leave the server

peti what siege have u even planned for? maybe u are different, but most nations siege towns for multiple reasons and not just for fighting. all of teutonic and shinsei sieges ik have been like that, and i am fairly sure it's the same with thracia, rome, gne and many other nations. peti u have never actually sieged a big town and only 1 man towns, so don't go around acting like u are some expert and i should listen to u. siege materials take time to grind for, pots and shells don't just come out of nowhere. i never said sieges don't have vanilla pvp, ofc they do, but it's a mixture of all types of pvp which can be unfun for some players. it's not like movecraft players are forced to go to these siege regions, if they don't want to fight in them, then don't fight. i don't want to fight in naval siege regions, so i don't, no big deal. this is only giving gun pvpers and sword pvpers more things to do because sieges don't happen all the time, and when they do, they don't appeal to all groups as much as this might

I planned for lot's and lot's of sieges, mostly defense sieges, but also offensive for my allies, and no u are really wrong when U say " 1 man town " because it doesn't fucking matter if it's one man town if U didn't realize it yet, because that town is in a nation and has allies. Pots are really cheap and easy to make, maybe you handbrew them, I don't. That's why I suggested that U should be able to siege any day of the week, so nations are actually not dead during the whole week expect id there's a siege, there's no actual reason why you shouldn't be siege any day of the week, sieges recently are really bad and boring, U can easily predict a siege, because of the feature that U can only siege during 2 daytime, peacefull towns, broken cannons, sky cannons, abusing cannons, guns do unbelievable knockback, movecraft bug that I can't report because I am banned off the discord, immunity abuse, all sieges are about numbers now who can get more people online all day, I won't say names but I didn't see some guys even bothering logging off a siege day. The old reversal method should be added back, or if the plugin developer doesn't want to, then it's time to find another one, this new reversal is just all about numbers and unfun, there's no way that U can win a siege with 10 people against 40 that's online basically all day, thanks to timezones and nolifers. Even if U manange to get a reversal U can't hold it, they will just get it back with 20 people capping the banner and get 100000 points. Old reversal system was all about logistics and tactics, U could easily take back banner control and get a reasonable amount of points. Whatever, I'd U can't learn how to pilot a ship then h are just dumb, it's really dumb easy thing to do everyone can learn it. This suggestion would make sieges pointless, and this suggestion is basically sieges but U don't have to prepare anything for it and U get easy money everday. Siege regions are for movecraft and not PvP, Pvpers can't really do anything in a naval siege anyways.

It's pointless to add this, as I said it won't be good for the server

Of course U think it's a great idea, even your alt does

tbfh sieging ppl has no actual reason, yall just want to fight lmao

It’s a good idea but i don’t like it, this siege region is gonna give free money to the nations that have more players and more pvpers.
Making a gun spam siege region is not the beast thing to do bec for me guns are made to stay with Movecraft.
IMO its better if players organize big fights (ganks) around the world instead of making random regions.


Also we’re building an enormous arena at termini, tournaments will be up soon!!!!
WE ARE PLANNING TO ORGANIZE BIG FIGHTS EVERY DAY



Turtle is right abt sieges btw.

Gimabis clown statement,how are guns made to stick with movecraft? No they're not at all,u dont shoot ship with Mosin rifle. I think there should definetly be a gun only siege region with like unbreakable covers and all.

I also think same for vanilla pvp siege region. They should be in a large arena of some sort,there is a building in middle that has a 3x3 block space in a circle of red wool where u cap if ure inside the circle. The goal would be to kb the one thats capping away or fighting it out till u cap it.

Like i said, those regions are going free money to the nations that have more players and more pvpers.
For example: PvP siege region (koth) is gonna give free money to thracians (+allies) since they can get a lot of players from other servers (thing that they did multiple times during important sieges).
Gun siege region will give free money to gege’s roleplayes.
If sieges are expensive and boring organize ganks (PvP in wilderness) around the map.

Regarding guns, maybe I didn't express myself well, but for me guns are important in every aspect of PvP (especially vanilla PvP) so FOR ME a gun region will be useless

I think numbers can be fixed by making a locking system of sort, so you can only have 10 players from one side max locked so it will be a 10v10 KOTH, It fixes the numbers benefit and forces nations to send only their best players. AS for the gun spam, idk how but if possible it being disabled would be quite epic in these regions and another thing id prolly like to add is something like towny resources being provided to taking control of the said region so its not just money.

gun region :skull: